Paseo OpenCode
Paseo OpenCode keeps open coding workflows reviewable
Open coding-agent workflows are attractive because teams can inspect, adapt, and self-host more of the stack. Paseo Code adds a managed product path for teams that want the value of open workflows without making every buyer operate the infrastructure.
For users comparing OpenCode-style approaches with a hosted Paseo Code workspace.
Open workflow strengths
Open workflows make it easier to inspect prompts, tools, scripts, and generated changes. That matters when an agent can touch code, files, and commands.
The tradeoff is operational complexity. Someone still has to define permissions, memory, runners, logs, checkout, analytics, and onboarding.
- Inspectable tool and command behavior.
- Adaptable prompts and workflow steps.
- Better fit for teams that need private infrastructure.
- Higher responsibility for security, deployment, and support.
Where a managed plan fits
A managed plan is useful when the team already knows the first mission and wants to move quickly. It should not hide how the workflow operates; it should make the path easier to buy, start, and evaluate.
Paseo Code keeps the public product path focused on the first mission, Studio annual pricing, and a payment popup that leaves the original page in place.
When to choose Scale
Choose Scale when private runners, heavier GitHub automation, API embedding, or organization controls are already required. Otherwise, Studio annual is the right default starting point.
Common questions
Is Paseo OpenCode a separate product?
It is a workflow page for people comparing open coding-agent approaches with Paseo Code. Paseo Code is the product.
Can open workflows still use managed checkout?
Yes. Teams can keep an open or self-hosted technical posture while using a managed product path for onboarding and payment.
Does annual billing apply to all plans?
Yes. Annual billing is available across plans and is selected by default with a 50% discount versus monthly.